[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131122023406.GG31921@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 21:34:06 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, jerry.hoemann@...com,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/2] Early use of boot service memory
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:31:54PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/21/2013 05:29 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:25 PM, <jerry.hoemann@...com> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:12:57PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>
> >> Large systems w/ lots of IO require large crash kernel allocations for
> >> the kernel to boot. Then you have to worry about the OOM killer.....
> >
> > so go with crashkernel=1024M,high.
> >
>
> Yes, there is no bloody excuse to hog that much low memory.
Curious, why is low memory precious on x86_64? Who is going to use it?
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists