linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf util: optimize util/machine.c:machines_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <528FA98E.4080708@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:59:26 -0500
From:	Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf util: optimize util/machine.c:machines__find().



On 11/21/2013 07:06 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
>> This changes machines__find to always return the machine for the
>> host (pid == 0). This function is also used for VM lookups.
> Nope:
>
> /* Native host kernel uses -1 as pid index in machine */
> #define HOST_KERNEL_ID                  (-1)
> #define DEFAULT_GUEST_KERNEL_ID         (0)
>
> But I fail to see the point of the "optimization", we're looking for a
> pid, not always for '0'.
>
> And the changelog is horrible, why is it "unnecessary"? Please don't be
> so terse :-)
>
> - Arnaldo
>

Hi David and Arnaldo,

     It is my mistake about it!! The original code does the right thing.
     Sorry to bother you, I am a newbie for perf.
     I will send a patch after second and third thought next time.

Thanx for your reply.

- Yang


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/