linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAVeFuK_76Rnqa8E0DpME8Eyc3vh63HmyHx=zbeyaKz7aXm=rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 23 Nov 2013 18:21:03 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] gpio / ACPI: get rid of acpi_gpio.h

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Now that all users of acpi_gpio.h have been moved to user either the GPIO

s/user/use

> descriptor interface or to the internal gpiolib.h we can get rid of

gpiolib.h will also need to be renamed if you follow my suggestion below.

> acpi_gpio.h entirely.
>
> Once this is done the only interface to get GPIOs to drivers enumerated
> from ACPI namespace is the descriptor based interface.

Oh, do I like this. :)

>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c |  4 +++-
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      |  1 -
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/acpi_gpio.h   | 45 ---------------------------------------------
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/acpi_gpio.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> index cb2da66fbbfe..6c158d9a6efa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-acpi.c
> @@ -12,11 +12,13 @@
>
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>
> +#include "gpiolib.h"
> +
>  struct acpi_gpio_evt_pin {
>         struct list_head node;
>         acpi_handle *evt_handle;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 70abccf0d144..a6b82413c290 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> -#include <linux/acpi_gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/idr.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> index 2ed23ab8298c..82be586c1f90 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h
> @@ -12,12 +12,35 @@
>  #ifndef GPIOLIB_H
>  #define GPIOLIB_H
>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * struct acpi_gpio_info - ACPI GPIO specific information
> + * @gpioint: if %true this GPIO is of type GpioInt otherwise type is GpioIo
> + * @active_low: in case of @gpioint, the pin is active low
> + */
> +struct acpi_gpio_info {
> +       bool gpioint;
> +       bool active_low;
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip);
>  void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip);
> +
> +struct gpio_desc *acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> +                                         struct acpi_gpio_info *info);
>  #else
>  static inline void acpi_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
>  static inline void acpi_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
> +
> +static inline struct gpio_desc *
> +acpi_get_gpiod_by_index(struct device *dev, int index,
> +                       struct acpi_gpio_info *info)
> +{
> +       return ERR_PTR(-ENOSYS);
> +}
>  #endif

Since this header contains purely ACPI-related declarations so far, I wonder
if it should not be renamed acpi.h?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/