linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131124161858.626cc9b2@alan.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:18:58 +0000
From:	One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available_p() by
 call site

On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:01:56 -0500
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:

> On 11/23/2013 07:26 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:23 -0500
> > Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Distinguish if caller is n_tty_poll() or n_tty_read(), and
> >> set the read/wakeup threshold accordingly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
> >
> > Doh ignore previous.. yes that patch is right.  I should pay attention to
> > 0/7 8)
> 
> Maybe I should add more to the commit message from the cover letter
> description ?

Maybe I should just read the code more carefully 8).

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/