[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52915E14.7000703@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 21:01:56 -0500
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tty-next 5/7] n_tty: Refactor input_available_p() by call
site
On 11/23/2013 07:26 PM, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:59:23 -0500
> Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> Distinguish if caller is n_tty_poll() or n_tty_read(), and
>> set the read/wakeup threshold accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
>
> Doh ignore previous.. yes that patch is right. I should pay attention to
> 0/7 8)
Maybe I should add more to the commit message from the cover letter
description ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists