linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52918ECC.6080707@linaro.org>
Date:	Sun, 24 Nov 2013 13:29:48 +0800
From:	Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, pjt@...gle.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
CC:	james.hogan@...tec.com, jason.low2@...com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay.

On 11/22/2013 08:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> 
> Hi Alex,
> 
> I tried on my Xeon server (2 x 4 cores) your patchset and got the
> following result:
> 
> kernel a5d6e63323fe7799eb0e6  / + patchset
> 
> hackbench -T -s 4096 -l 1000 -g 10 -f 40
>       27.604              38.556

Wondering if the following patch is helpful on your Xeon server?

Btw, you can run vmstat as background tool or use 'perf sched'
to get scheduler statistics change for this patchset.

The following are results of original kernel and all 5 patches 
on pandaboard ES.

    latest kernel 527d1511310a89        + this patchset
hackbench -T -g 10 -f 40
    23.25"                    20.79"
    23.16"                    20.4"
    24.24"                    20.29"
hackbench -p -g 10 -f 40
    26.52"                    21.2"
    23.89"                    24.07"
    25.65"                    20.30"
hackbench -P -g 10 -f 40
    20.14"                    19.53"
    19.96"                    20.37"
    21.76"                    20.39"

------
>From 4f5efd6c2b1e7293410ad57c3db24dcf3394c4a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 23:18:09 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] sched: aggravate target cpu load to reduce task moving

Task migration happens when target just a bit less then source cpu load
to reduce such situation happens, aggravate the target cpu with sd->
imbalance_pct.

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index bccdd89..c49b7ba 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static inline unsigned long group_weight(struct task_struct *p, int nid)
 
 static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu);
 static unsigned long source_load(int cpu);
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu);
+static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct);
 static unsigned long power_of(int cpu);
 static long effective_load(struct task_group *tg, int cpu, long wl, long wg);
 
@@ -3809,11 +3809,17 @@ static unsigned long source_load(int cpu)
  * Return a high guess at the load of a migration-target cpu weighted
  * according to the scheduling class and "nice" value.
  */
-static unsigned long target_load(int cpu)
+static unsigned long target_load(int cpu, int imbalance_pct)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	unsigned long total = weighted_cpuload(cpu);
 
+	/*
+	 * without cpu_load decay, in most of time cpu_load is same as total
+	 * so we need to make target a bit heavier to reduce task migration
+	 */
+	total = total * imbalance_pct / 100;
+
 	if (!sched_feat(LB_BIAS))
 		return total;
 
@@ -4033,7 +4039,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
 	this_cpu  = smp_processor_id();
 	prev_cpu  = task_cpu(p);
 	load	  = source_load(prev_cpu);
-	this_load = target_load(this_cpu);
+	this_load = target_load(this_cpu, 100);
 
 	/*
 	 * If sync wakeup then subtract the (maximum possible)
@@ -4089,7 +4095,7 @@ static int wake_affine(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int sync)
 
 	if (balanced ||
 	    (this_load <= load &&
-	     this_load + target_load(prev_cpu) <= tl_per_task)) {
+	     this_load + target_load(prev_cpu, 100) <= tl_per_task)) {
 		/*
 		 * This domain has SD_WAKE_AFFINE and
 		 * p is cache cold in this domain, and
@@ -4135,7 +4141,7 @@ find_idlest_group(struct sched_domain *sd, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
 			if (local_group)
 				load = source_load(i);
 			else
-				load = target_load(i);
+				load = target_load(i, sd->imbalance_pct);
 
 			avg_load += load;
 		}
@@ -5478,7 +5484,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
 
 		/* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */
 		if (local_group)
-			load = target_load(i);
+			load = target_load(i, env->sd->imbalance_pct);
 		else
 			load = source_load(i);
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/