[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2845101.Wgsx5afvdX@sandpuppy>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 15:43:47 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKP <fnstml-lkp@...fujitsu.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at init/main.c:711 do_one_initcall()
Am Montag, 25. November 2013, 16:32:19 schrieb Boaz Harrosh:
> On 11/25/2013 04:15 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Yuanhan Liu
> >
> > <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> I got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
> >>
> >> commit 20545536cd8ea949c61527b6395ec8c0d2c237b1
> >> Author: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
> >> Date: Thu Jul 19 15:22:37 2012 +0300
> >>
> >> RFC: do_xor_speed Broken on UML do to jiffies
> >>
> >> Remember that hang I reported a while back on UML. Well
> >> I'm at it again, and it still hangs and I found why.
> >>
> >> I have dprinted jiffies and it never advances during the
> >> loop at do_xor_speed. There for it is stuck in an endless
> >> loop. I have also dprinted current_kernel_time() and it
> >> returns the same constant value as well.
> >>
> >> Note that it does usually work on UML, only during
> >> the modprobe of xor.ko while that test is running. It looks
> >> like some lucking is preventing the clock from ticking.
> >>
> >> However ktime_get_ts does work for me so I changed the code
> >> as below, so I can work. See how I put several safety
> >> guards, to never get hangs again.
> >> And I think my time based approach is more accurate then
> >> previous system.
> >>
> >> UML guys please investigate the jiffies issue? what is
> >> xor.ko not doing right?
> >
> > This patch never hit my mailbox...
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
>
> Sir Richard
>
> I never followed on this patch. Sorry. I do think it is in
> the right direction, but it has a dev-by-zero problem and
> a 32 bitness problem. (So I never sent it, beyond the initial
> query)
>
> [It stopped to be very important for me since I stopped using
> UM very much. Ever since FC17 I'm unable to produce a running
> image. It just will not boot, an image that a kvm would. So
> very sad me, but no UML for me anymore.]
Sad to hear.
Did you try one from http://fs.devloop.org.uk/?
Just booted a FC18 on UML. Works fine.
In the past we've had some issues with systemd-enabled distros.
systemd uncovered problem in the UML tty driver.
> If you want to investigate. try doing a modprobe xor.ko on
> a uml and see. since xor.ko is only built on demand for example
> enabling exofs or object-layout-driver will select it. ,or MD-raid5.
Ok.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists