[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5293652B.80402@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 16:56:43 +0200
From: "ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<wim@...ana.be>, <nsekhar@...com>,
<linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>, <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
<rob.herring@...xeda.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<grant.likely@...aro.org>, <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] watchdog: davinci: change driver to use WDT core
On 11/25/2013 04:16 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> On Monday 25 November 2013 09:04 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>> To reduce code duplicate and increase code readability use WDT core
>> code to handle WDT interface.
>>
>> Remove io_lock as the WDT core uses mutex to lock each wdt device.
>> Remove wdt_state as the WDT core tracks state with its own variable.
>>
>> The watchdog_init_timeout() can read timeout value from timeout-sec
>> property if the passed value is out of bounds. The heartbeat is
>> initialized in next way. If heartbeat is not set thought module
>> parameter, try to read it's value from WDT node timeout-sec property.
>> If node has no one, use default value.
>>
>> The heartbeat is hold in wdd->timeout by WDT core, so use it in
>> order to set timeout period.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
>> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>
> Minor suggestion regarding the SOB line which applies to
> rest of the series as well. Typically your SOB line
> should be the last one like below.
>
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
>
> No need to repost the series just for that. The last
> patch as I commented earlier, needs to be separate
> patch which will go via linux-keystone tree.
>
> Once the watchdog maintainer is happy with rest of the
> series and applies it, I will pick last patch.
>
> Regards,
> Santosh
>
Thanks, Santosh
I'll take note.
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists