| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:41:35 -0500 From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.cz, glommer@...nvz.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/15] kmemcg shrinkers I ran out of steam reviewing these because there were too many things that should be changed in the first couple patches. I realize this is frustrating to see these type of complaints in v11 of a patch series, but the review bandwidth was simply exceeded back when Glauber submitted this along with the kmem accounting patches. A lot of the kmemcg commits themselves don't even have review tags or acks, but it all got merged anyway, and the author has moved on to different projects... Too much stuff slips past the only two people that have more than one usecase on their agenda and are willing to maintain this code base - which is in desparate need of rework and pushback against even more drive-by feature dumps. I have repeatedly asked to split the memcg tree out of the memory tree to better deal with the vastly different developmental stages of memcg and the rest of the mm code, to no avail. So I don't know what to do anymore, but this is not working. Thoughts? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists