[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1434978251.31721.1385404366021.JavaMail.apache@mail83.abv.bg>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 20:32:46 +0200 (EET)
From: Ивайло Димитров
<freemangordon@....bg>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...g0.de>
Cc: pavel@....cz, pali.rohar@...il.com, anton@...msg.org,
dwmw2@...radead.org, tony@...mide.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
aaro.koskinen@....fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] bq2415x_charger: Use power_supply notifier for automode
>-------- Оригинално писмо --------
>От: Sebastian Reichel
>Относно: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] bq2415x_charger: Use power_supply notifier for
automode
>До: Ивайло Димитров
>Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2013, Ноември 25 19:14:21 EET
>
>
>On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:01:54PM +0200, Ивайло Димитров wrote:
>>> Now.. Imagine phone left in car in charger (on sun). Likely
>>> temperature will reach high values, kernel is charging, dsme will
>>> reboot the system, but kernel will start charging again, dsme will
>>> reboot again, ...
>>>
>>> And it is not only high temperatures that are problem for li-ion
>>> charging; battery should not be fast charged below 5C and should not
>>> be charged below 0C. (Again, both are likely to happen if you leave
>>> your phone in car).
>>>
>>> AFAICT, we should simply disable charging below 5C or above 45C.
>>
>> AFAIK dsme will not restart it, but power it off, so the above
>> scenario won't happen.
>
>Just assume what happens, when dsme does not start (e.g. system boot
>hangs).
>
>If everything is controlled from userspace, charger would not start
>(-> safe!). If everything is controlled by the kernel, temperature
>safety checks are taken (-> safe!). But in the currently proposed
>variant: No safety checks.
>
>-- Sebastian
>
>
Hmm, you have a point here :)
So, AIUI there are 2 options:
1. charger driver polls the battery driver every n (60?) seconds.
2. battery driver sends PSY_EVENT_PROP_CHANGED on every degree up or
down
In both cases if the temperature is outside of the safe margins, the
charging should be stopped.
2 seems more generic to me, but as rx51-battery is missing the
functionality to send events on temperature change, I guess 1 will
be easier to implement.
And I think there should be some method (sysfs entry?, /dev/bqxxx
opened?) to tell the charger driver to stop polling the battery
driver once (and if) the userspace has started to take care of the
battery temperature - makes no sense to duplicate the checks IMO.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists