linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: Move device_del() from pci_stop_dev() to pci_destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUuZO2BtjnG-XVoFMO5kqd97bEt9sNKzh3VZ2BJkvVnLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:45:50 -0800
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Move device_del() from pci_stop_dev() to pci_destroy_dev()

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
> Well, is_removed is only used by pci_destroy_dev() in your patch, right?
>
> That means its only role is to protect the device from being destroyed
> twice (or more times) in a row, but that surely would be a bug?  I don't
> see how that can legitimately happen at least, so what exactly is the
> scenario?

The thread:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3119001/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/