linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable biovecs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131126060558.GA6434@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:05:58 -0800
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, snitzer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Immutable biovecs

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:52:16PM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Jens - here's immutable biovecs, rebased and ready for 3.14. Changes since the
> last version of the series:

Can you do a resend of the patch series to all involved lists first so
we can have a detailed look at the current version?

> 
>  * bio_clone_bioset() retains the old behaviour, as previously discussed -
>    bio_clone_fast() is being used by bcache, dm and the new bio_split().

Any chance to have a more descriptive name than bio_clone_fast?  Also
without having the actual patches in front of me, did you make sure to
document the different in semantics in detail?

>  * refactoring patches to use submit_bio_wait() and bio_for_each_segment()

Jens already applied the submit_bio_wait patch.  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/