[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131126082626.GB789@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 09:26:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Ma, Xindong" <xindong.ma@...el.com>
Cc: "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable-commits@...r.kernel.org" <stable-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"ccross@...gle.com" <ccross@...gle.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"dvhart@...ux.intel.com" <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Tu, Xiaobing" <xiaobing.tu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: Add memory barrier when waiting on futex
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 01:07:25AM +0000, Ma, Xindong wrote:
> I've already aware that they've protected by spinlock, this is why I adding a memory barrier to fix it.
That doesn't make sense.. the spinlocks should provide the required
serialization, there's nothing to fix.
> I reproduced this issue several times on android which running on IA dual core.
I think you need to be more specific, in particular, if spinlocks do not
provide serialization on your IA32 device, I'd call that thing broken.
Adding random memory barriers is _WRONG_.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists