lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 00:01:53 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> Subject: Re: clk: clk_round_rate() should return 0, not negative numbers, upon error On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 03:55:33PM -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Update the documentation for clk_round_rate() to state that it should > return 0 rather than a negative error code when it encounters an > error. This describes how the common clock framework currently works; > howeever, some clock code does not yet align to this. > > This change is to prepare for returning unsigned values from > clk_round_rate(). You really ought to document why this is being changed here, to help sell the change to parties who are not aware of the background. Otherwise, it just looks like a gratuitous API change. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists