[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52949C72.8050605@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 21:04:50 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, pjt@...gle.com, fengguang.wu@...el.com
CC: james.hogan@...tec.com, jason.low2@...com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay.
On 11/26/2013 09:01 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> Ok, bad copy-paste, the third test run results with the patchset is wrong.
>
> hackbench -P -s 4096 -l 1000 -g 10 -f 40
> 38.938 39.585
> 39.363 39.008
> 39.340 38.954
> 38.909 39.273
> 39.095 38.755
> 38.869 39.003
> 39.041 38.945
> 38.939 38.005
> 38.992 38.994
> 38.947 38.855
Oops,
Anyway, at least, no harm on hackbench process testing. :)
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists