[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1385478286-5525-6-git-send-email-bergwolf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:04:39 +0800
From: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fan Yong <fan.yong@...el.com>,
Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/12] staging/lustre/scrub: OI scrub on OST
From: Fan Yong <fan.yong@...el.com>
Main part of original patch in Lustre tree
(http://review.whamcloud.com/6669) changes server code and
is unneeded by client. The patch only picks up common
functions and data structures change.
Quoting original commit message here:
"
OI scrub should has the ability to handle kinds of OI, including
both the OI files on MDT and the /O directory on OST.
We trust the FID in LMA for both MDT objects and OST objects. So
if some /O sub-item does not match related LMA, then the /O will
be updated, instead of the LMA.
To guarantee that the OI scrub can run without MDT0 involved for
FLDB, the OST object needs to store some flag in its LMA to tell
OI scrub that it is for an OST object, no need to query the MDT0.
"
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-3335
Lustre-change: http://review.whamcloud.com/6669
Signed-off-by: Fan Yong <fan.yong@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Zhuravlev <alexey.zhuravlev@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Tao <bergwolf@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
---
.../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h | 7 +++++--
.../staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h | 1 +
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
index 7dfb925..08da4f3 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_idl.h
@@ -321,8 +321,11 @@ static inline int range_compare_loc(const struct lu_seq_range *r1,
* xattr.
*/
enum lma_compat {
- LMAC_HSM = 0x00000001,
- LMAC_SOM = 0x00000002,
+ LMAC_HSM = 0x00000001,
+ LMAC_SOM = 0x00000002,
+ LMAC_NOT_IN_OI = 0x00000004, /* the object does NOT need OI mapping */
+ LMAC_FID_ON_OST = 0x00000008, /* For OST-object, its OI mapping is
+ * under /O/<seq>/d<x>. */
};
/**
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
index 825a0c9..1748985 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/include/obd_support.h
@@ -256,6 +256,7 @@ int obd_alloc_fail(const void *ptr, const char *name, const char *type,
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_SCRUB_FATAL 0x192
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_FID_MAPPING 0x193
#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_LMA_INCOMPAT 0x194
+#define OBD_FAIL_OSD_COMPAT_INVALID_ENTRY 0x195
#define OBD_FAIL_OST 0x200
#define OBD_FAIL_OST_CONNECT_NET 0x201
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
index e3f02c7..7160a23 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
@@ -433,6 +433,10 @@ void lustre_assert_wire_constants(void)
(unsigned)LMAC_HSM);
LASSERTF(LMAC_SOM == 0x00000002UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
(unsigned)LMAC_SOM);
+ LASSERTF(LMAC_NOT_IN_OI == 0x00000004UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
+ (unsigned)LMAC_NOT_IN_OI);
+ LASSERTF(LMAC_FID_ON_OST == 0x00000008UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
+ (unsigned)LMAC_FID_ON_OST);
LASSERTF(OBJ_CREATE == 1, "found %lld\n",
(long long)OBJ_CREATE);
LASSERTF(OBJ_DESTROY == 2, "found %lld\n",
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists