[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131126175037.GE14028@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:50:37 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: modules, add_kallsyms() && DEFINE_PER_CPU
On 11/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Note: this doesn't work for modules, but module's per-cpu data is
> not visible for kallsyms_lookup_name() anyway.
Rusty, I am just curious if it makes sense to change this or not...
But DEFINE_PER_CPU'ed symbols are ignored by add_kallsyms(). I guess
this is because is_core_symbol() requires "sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC".
And probably because of INIT_OFFSET_MASK.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists