linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: unwinding: use the per-feature check flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 18:58:19 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: unwinding: use the per-feature check flags


* Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org> wrote:

> Use the per-feature check flags for the unwinding feature in order
> to correctly compile the libunwind and libunwind-debug-frame feature
> checks.
> 
> Tested on ARMv7 and ARMv8 with 'make DEBUG=1 LIBUNWIND_DIR=/usr/local
> -C tools/perf'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/config/Makefile                | 38 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  tools/perf/config/feature-checks/Makefile |  6 ++---
>  2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Does the x86 build work fine as well, as before? If yes then:

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
 
Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/