lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131126181029.271774771@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 10:12:30 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.11 20/36] PCI: Remove PCIe Capability version checks

3.11-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

commit c8b303d0206b28c4ff3aecada47108d1655ae00f upstream.

Previously we relied on the PCIe r3.0, sec 7.8, spec language that says
"For Functions that do not implement the [Link, Slot, Root] registers,
these spaces must be hardwired to 0b," which means that for v2 PCIe
capabilities, we don't need to check the device type at all.

But it's simpler if we don't need to check the capability version at all,
and I think the spec is explicit enough about which registers are required
for which types that we can remove the version checks.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Reviewed-By: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pci/access.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -484,8 +484,7 @@ static inline bool pcie_cap_has_lnkctl(c
 {
 	int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
 
-	return pcie_cap_version(dev) > 1 ||
-	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT ||
+	return type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ENDPOINT ||
 	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_LEG_END ||
 	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
 	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_UPSTREAM ||
@@ -498,8 +497,7 @@ static inline bool pcie_cap_has_sltctl(c
 {
 	int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
 
-	return pcie_cap_version(dev) > 1 ||
-	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
+	return type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
 	       (type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_DOWNSTREAM &&
 		pcie_caps_reg(dev) & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_SLOT);
 }
@@ -508,8 +506,7 @@ static inline bool pcie_cap_has_rtctl(co
 {
 	int type = pci_pcie_type(dev);
 
-	return pcie_cap_version(dev) > 1 ||
-	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
+	return type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT ||
 	       type == PCI_EXP_TYPE_RC_EC;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ