[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJvTdKm8bcUsnn_=_f_NQzJJ_FgmX6Ch3XDK3un22vwE9_Qh_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 13:43:24 -0500
From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To: Bockholdt Arne <a.bockholdt@...citec-optronik.de>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] intel_idle: Fixed C6 state on Avoton/Rangeley processors
> .desc = "MWAIT 0x51",
> - .flags = MWAIT2flg(0x58) | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED,
> + .flags = MWAIT2flg(0x51) | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID | CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED,
> .exit_latency = 15,
> .target_residency = 45,
Thanks for noticing that .desc and .flags are inconsistent.
This is my fault -- apparently I e-mailed a version of this patch that
is older than what I have in my git tree.
No big issue, though, as 0x51 and 0x58 do exactly the same thing in
AVN hardware.
Indeed, changing .desc to 0x58 would be fine also.
Acked-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists