[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaK3Lvw+DjWTjkU-AUyHY98YWQD58Lw10COG44WvOJSgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 00:49:17 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: pl061: print resource_size_t as %pa
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 10:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>> amba_set_drvdata(adev, chip);
>>> - dev_err(&adev->dev, "PL061 GPIO chip @%08x registered\n",
>>> - adev->res.start);
>>> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "PL061 GPIO chip @%pa registered\n",
>>> + &adev->res.start);
>>
>> This looks as if this should not use dev_err, but maybe dev_info
>> and maybe it should use %pR, &adev->res
>
> Yep, I have as a somewhat long-standing todo to scrub for needlessly
> elevated printk levels (err and warn) on various drivers during boot,
> thanks for shortcutting that. :)
Bah copy/paste bug from my side ...
> I'll let Linus decide on pR vs pa.
I go with the thing you tested, fixed up the commit and also
switched to dev_info().
But now I have worse PL061 problems than this.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists