[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131127005742.723099686@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:57:37 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lukasz Flis <l.flis@...ronet.pl>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 084/116] block: properly stack underlying max_segment_size to DM device
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
commit d82ae52e68892338068e7559a0c0657193341ce4 upstream.
Without this patch all DM devices will default to BLK_MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE
(65536) even if the underlying device(s) have a larger value -- this is
due to blk_stack_limits() using min_not_zero() when stacking the
max_segment_size limit.
1073741824
before patch:
65536
after patch:
1073741824
Reported-by: Lukasz Flis <l.flis@...ronet.pl>
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
block/blk-settings.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/block/blk-settings.c
+++ b/block/blk-settings.c
@@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queu
lim->discard_zeroes_data = 1;
lim->max_segments = USHRT_MAX;
lim->max_hw_sectors = UINT_MAX;
+ lim->max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
lim->max_sectors = UINT_MAX;
lim->max_write_same_sectors = UINT_MAX;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists