linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 065/116] nfs: fix inverted test for delegation in nfs4_reclaim_open

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20131127005741.439649855@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:57:18 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 065/116] nfs: fix inverted test for delegation in nfs4_reclaim_open_state

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>

commit 1acd1c301f4faae80f4d2c7bbd9a4553b131c0e3 upstream.

commit 6686390bab6a0e0 (NFS: remove incorrect "Lock reclaim failed!"
warning.) added a test for a delegation before checking to see if any
reclaimed locks failed. The test however is backward and is only doing
that check when a delegation is held instead of when one isn't.

Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Fixes: 6686390bab6a: NFS: remove incorrect "Lock reclaim failed!" warning.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nfs/nfs4state.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ restart:
 		if (status >= 0) {
 			status = nfs4_reclaim_locks(state, ops);
 			if (status >= 0) {
-				if (test_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags) != 0) {
+				if (!test_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags)) {
 					spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
 					list_for_each_entry(lock, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) {
 						if (!test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lock->ls_flags))

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/