[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52957B5E.60701@jonmasters.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 23:55:58 -0500
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: tony.luck@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Does Itanium permit speculative stores?
On 11/11/2013 12:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Hello, Tony,
>
> Does Itanium permit speculative stores? For example, on Itanium what are
> the permitted outcomes of the following litmus test, where both x and y
> are initially zero?
>
> CPU 0 CPU 1
>
> r1 = ACCESS_ONCE(x); r2 = ACCESS_ONCE(y);
> if (r1) if (r2)
> ACCESS_ONCE(y) = 1; ACCESS_ONCE(x) = 1;
>
> In particular, is the outcome (r1 == 1 && r2 == 1) possible on Itanium
> given this litmus test?
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Btw, I was reading through some UEFI docs and noticed a reference to "A
Formal Specification of Intel Itanium Processor Family Memory Ordering",
then remembered this thread. In case it's of use:
http://www.intel.com/design/itanium/downloads/251429.htm
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists