[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r4a2qmqo.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:20:47 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"yrl.pp-manager.tt\@hitachi.com" <yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: modules, add_kallsyms() && DEFINE_PER_CPU
Hi Masami,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:23:43 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2013/11/27 2:50), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> On 11/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>>
>>> Note: this doesn't work for modules, but module's per-cpu data is
>>> not visible for kallsyms_lookup_name() anyway.
>>
>> Rusty, I am just curious if it makes sense to change this or not...
>>
>> But DEFINE_PER_CPU'ed symbols are ignored by add_kallsyms(). I guess
>> this is because is_core_symbol() requires "sh_flags & SHF_ALLOC".
>> And probably because of INIT_OFFSET_MASK.
>
> Oleg, I think you can do it by using is_module_percpu_address(). :)
It seems the function only works for a translated address like
is_kernel_percpu_address() does. But we want to check a not-yet-
translated symbol address, right?
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists