[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALkWK0m7GaJMOpNom2zxG+3SU-FN3G1NPAaNVpUsqFpOCkEC2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:02:36 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] perf diff: color the Delta column
Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> index 79e0448..84d5f2d 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
>> @@ -769,6 +769,33 @@ static int hpp__entry_baseline(struct hist_entry *he, char *buf, size_t size)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static int hpp__color_delta(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
>> + struct perf_hpp *hpp, struct hist_entry *he)
>> +{
>> + struct diff_hpp_fmt *dfmt =
>> + container_of(fmt, struct diff_hpp_fmt, fmt);
>> + struct hist_entry *pair = get_pair_fmt(he, dfmt);
>> + double percent;
>> + char pfmt[20] = " ";
>> +
>> + if (!pair)
>> + goto dummy_print;
>
> same comment here ^^^ as for previous patch
Hm? The comment on the previous patch pertained to printing the delta
if he->dummy was set (ie. if `he' doesn't have any pairs). This
statement is analogous to the logic in __hpp__entry_global(): if
(!pair), then the next line checking pair->diff.computed will segfault
without this check.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists