[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131127112725.GT14725@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:27:25 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Li Xiubo <Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
Cc: "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"perex@...ex.cz" <perex@...ex.cz>, "tiwai@...e.de" <tiwai@...e.de>,
Fabio Estevam <Fabio.Estevam@...escale.com>,
"LW@...O-electronics.de" <LW@...O-electronics.de>,
"oskar@...ra.com" <oskar@...ra.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] ASoC: SGTL5000: Fix kernel failed while getting
regulator consumers
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 08:13:03AM +0000, Li Xiubo wrote:
Please fix your mailer to word wrap within paragraphs, it makes your
mail much more legible.
> There is one dependency patch: "regulator: core: Provide a dummy regulator with full constraints".
> From the dependency patch, we can see that using regulator_get_optional() instead can resovle the problem you descripted above.
> When or will this dependency patch be merged into the -next tree ?
That patch is already in mainline.
> > I'd expect to see a commit description that describes how the driver
> > currently tries to handle this, why it doesn't work and how the patch
> > fixes it.
> The SGTL5000 requires 2 external power supplies: VDDA and VDDIO. An
> optional third external power supply VDDD may be provided externally
You need to put your working through of this stuff in the commit
message.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists