[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131127115052.GX29824@moon>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:50:52 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: William Dauchy <wdauchy@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.11 54/66] mm: migration: do not lose soft dirty bit if
page is in migration state
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:38:10PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I was wondering if v3.10.x stable branch was also concerned by this
> patch since I did not found it in this later branch.
> Maybe too hard to backport? (I saw that it requires new functions like
> pte_swp_soft_dirty which is not present in v3.10.x)
> Maybe it was planned in the future?
"Soft dirty bit" feature introduced in 3.11 kernel and as far as I know
we've no plans to backport it on 3.10 series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists