linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: davinci: aemif: get rid of davinci-nand driver dependency on aemif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:37:07 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	"ivan.khoronzhuk" <ivan.khoronzhuk@...com>
CC:	<rob@...dley.net>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<grygorii.strashko@...com>, <pawel.moll@....com>,
	<swarren@...dotorg.org>, <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	<galak@...nel.crashing.org>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: davinci: aemif: get rid of davinci-nand driver dependency
 on aemif

On Wednesday 27 November 2013 04:31 PM, ivan.khoronzhuk wrote:
>>> @@ -192,9 +193,15 @@ static __init void davinci_ntosd2_init(void)
>>>           davinci_cfg_reg(DM644X_ATAEN_DISABLE);
>>>
>>>           /* only one device will be jumpered and detected */
>>> -        if (HAS_NAND)
>>> +        if (HAS_NAND) {
>>>               platform_device_register(
>>>                       &davinci_ntosd2_nandflash_device);
>>> +
>>> +            if (davinci_aemif_setup(
>>> +                &davinci_ntosd2_nandflash_device))
>>> +                pr_warn("%s: Cannot configure AEMIF.\n",
>>> +                    __func__);
>>
>> This is looking really ugly. Can you shorten
>> davinci_ntosd2_nandflash_device to just "ntosd2_nandflash" or similar?
> 
> The rename is not related to the patch, so I won't do this.

The reason I asked you to rename is not because I want to push some
random clean-up into this patch. You had to introduce a line so broken
that its almost unreadable. I offered the suggestion as a way to improve
the readability of the code you are introducing in *this* patch.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/