lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:03:32 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
	arjan@...ux.intel.com, linux@...ck-us.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: override __compiletime_object_size()


* Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com> wrote:

> As discussed in the context of commits 3df7b41a ("x86: Unify
> copy_from_user() size checking") and 7a3d9b0f ("x86: Unify
> copy_to_user() and add size checking to it"), we want to leverage
> __builtin_object_size() also on newer gcc versions, but with other
> architectures still using another model of copy_*_user() verification
> we can't replace the global definition. Do it in the (only) header
> needing the construct for now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h |    6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> --- 3.13-rc1/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ 3.13-rc1-x86-compiletime-object-size/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -584,6 +584,12 @@ __copy_from_user_overflow(int size, unsi
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +/* linux/compiler-gcc4.h restricts this to gcc < 4.6, which doesn't suit us. */
> +#if defined(__GNUC__) && GCC_VERSION >= 40100
> +# undef __compiletime_object_size
> +# define __compiletime_object_size(obj) __builtin_object_size(obj, 0)
> +#endif
> +

Would be nice to have a more verbose changelog that explains what 
benefits this brings us.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ