[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131127100056.4f3fe29c@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:00:56 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com,
harald.gustafsson@...csson.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
bruce.ashfield@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] sched: add latency tracing for -deadline tasks.
On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 15:26:49 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 09:16:47AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:43:45 +0100
> > Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
> > > index f76f8d6..ad94604 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
> > > @@ -1023,16 +1023,16 @@ trace_selftest_startup_nop(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
> > > static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
> > > {
> > > /* Make this a -deadline thread */
> > > - struct sched_param2 paramx = {
> > > + static const struct sched_param2 param = {
> > > .sched_priority = 0,
> > > + .sched_flags = 0,
> > > .sched_runtime = 100000ULL,
> > > .sched_deadline = 10000000ULL,
> > > .sched_period = 10000000ULL
> > > - .sched_flags = 0
> >
> > Assigning structures like this, you don't need to set the zero fields.
> > all fields not explicitly stated, are set to zero.
>
> Only because its static. Otherwise unnamed members have indeterminate
> value after initialization.
Hmm, I wonder if there's a gcc extension that guarantees it. Because I
could have sworn I've seen initialization of structures that expected
zero'd behavior elsewhere in the kernel.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists