[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131127151045.GE1208@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:10:45 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf tools: Add trace-event global object for
tracepoint interface
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:46:00PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> 2013-11-25 (월), 17:03 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:47:14AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > 2013-11-21 (목), 12:01 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > > > In order to get the proper plugins processing we need to
> > > > use full trace-event interface when creating tracepoint
> > > > events. So far we were using shortcut to get the parsed
> > > > format.
> > > >
> > > > Moving current 'event_format__new' function into trace-event
> > > > object as 'trace_event__tp_format'.
> > > >
> > > > This function uses properly initialized global trace-event
> > > > object, ensuring proper plugins processing.
> > >
> > > I see this when I compile it on my old ubuntu 10.04 box (with gcc 4.4.3)
> > >
> > > CC util/trace-event.o
> > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > > util/trace-event.c: In function 'trace_event__tp_format':
> > > util/trace-event.c:63: error: not protecting function: no buffer at
> > > least 8 bytes long
> > > make[1]: *** [util/trace-event.o] Error 1
> >
> > hum, what was the stackprotector status?
> >
> > ... stackprotector: [ on ]
> > ... stackprotector-all: [ on ]
>
> Right. Both of them were turned on.
>
> Auto-detecting system features:
> ... backtrace: [ on ]
> ... dwarf: [ on ]
> ... fortify-source: [ on ]
> ... glibc: [ on ]
> ... gtk2: [ on ]
> ... gtk2-infobar: [ on ]
> ... libaudit: [ on ]
> ... libbfd: [ on ]
> ... libelf: [ on ]
> ... libelf-getphdrnum: [ OFF ]
> ... libelf-mmap: [ on ]
> ... libnuma: [ OFF ]
> ... libperl: [ on ]
> ... libpython: [ on ]
> ... libpython-version: [ on ]
> ... libslang: [ on ]
> ... libunwind: [ OFF ]
> ... on-exit: [ on ]
> ... stackprotector: [ on ]
> ... stackprotector-all: [ on ]
> ... timerfd: [ on ]
I found that -fstack-protector might not always work:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/691722
they say it was fixed in gcc 4.5.0 which I was not
able to prove in gcc release notes..
we could disable the warning like in the below
for gcc < 4.5.0, could you please test?
any other idea? ;-)
thanks,
jirka
---
diff --git a/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c b/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c
index c9f398d..c0ace8b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c
+++ b/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c
@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
#include <stdio.h>
+#define GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 \
+ + __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 \
+ + __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
+
+#if GCC_VERSION < 40500
+#error "failed"
+#endif
+
int main(void)
{
return puts("hi");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists