linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf tools: Add trace-event global object for tracepoint interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:10:45 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf tools: Add trace-event global object for
 tracepoint interface

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:46:00PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> 2013-11-25 (월), 17:03 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:47:14AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > 2013-11-21 (목), 12:01 +0100, Jiri Olsa:
> > > > In order to get the proper plugins processing we need to
> > > > use full trace-event interface when creating tracepoint
> > > > events. So far we were using shortcut to get the parsed
> > > > format.
> > > > 
> > > > Moving current 'event_format__new' function into trace-event
> > > > object as 'trace_event__tp_format'.
> > > > 
> > > > This function uses properly initialized global trace-event
> > > > object, ensuring proper plugins processing.
> > > 
> > > I see this when I compile it on my old ubuntu 10.04 box (with gcc 4.4.3)
> > > 
> > >   CC       util/trace-event.o
> > > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > > util/trace-event.c: In function 'trace_event__tp_format':
> > > util/trace-event.c:63: error: not protecting function: no buffer at
> > > least 8 bytes long
> > > make[1]: *** [util/trace-event.o] Error 1
> > 
> > hum, what was the stackprotector status?
> > 
> > ...                stackprotector: [ on  ]
> > ...            stackprotector-all: [ on  ]
> 
> Right. Both of them were turned on.
> 
> Auto-detecting system features:
> ...                     backtrace: [ on  ]
> ...                         dwarf: [ on  ]
> ...                fortify-source: [ on  ]
> ...                         glibc: [ on  ]
> ...                          gtk2: [ on  ]
> ...                  gtk2-infobar: [ on  ]
> ...                      libaudit: [ on  ]
> ...                        libbfd: [ on  ]
> ...                        libelf: [ on  ]
> ...             libelf-getphdrnum: [ OFF ]
> ...                   libelf-mmap: [ on  ]
> ...                       libnuma: [ OFF ]
> ...                       libperl: [ on  ]
> ...                     libpython: [ on  ]
> ...             libpython-version: [ on  ]
> ...                      libslang: [ on  ]
> ...                     libunwind: [ OFF ]
> ...                       on-exit: [ on  ]
> ...                stackprotector: [ on  ]
> ...            stackprotector-all: [ on  ]
> ...                       timerfd: [ on  ]

I found that -fstack-protector might not always work:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/691722

they say it was fixed in gcc 4.5.0 which I was not
able to prove in gcc release notes..

we could disable the warning like in the below
for gcc < 4.5.0, could you please test?

any other idea? ;-)

thanks,
jirka

---
diff --git a/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c b/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c
index c9f398d..c0ace8b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c
+++ b/tools/perf/config/feature-checks/test-stackprotector.c
@@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 
+#define GCC_VERSION (__GNUC__ * 10000 \
+		+ __GNUC_MINOR__ * 100 \
+		+ __GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__)
+
+#if GCC_VERSION < 40500
+#error "failed"
+#endif
+
 int main(void)
 {
 	return puts("hi");
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/