[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131127154015.GG789@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:40:15 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
darren@...art.com, johan.eker@...csson.com, p.faure@...tech.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, claudio@...dence.eu.com,
michael@...rulasolutions.com, fchecconi@...il.com,
tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it, nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it,
luca.abeni@...tn.it, dhaval.giani@...il.com, hgu1972@...il.com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@...ux.it,
insop.song@...il.com, liming.wang@...driver.com, jkacur@...hat.com,
harald.gustafsson@...csson.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
bruce.ashfield@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] sched: add latency tracing for -deadline tasks.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 04:35:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So why does GCC then behave like this:
I think because its a much saner behaviour; also it might still be the
spec actually says this, its a somewhat opaque text.
Anyway, yes GCC seems to behave as we 'expect' it to; I just can't find
the language spec actually guaranteeing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists