linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm5110: Give new AIF2 registers defaults and mark as readable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131127160707.GC14725@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:07:07 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: wm5110: Give new AIF2 registers defaults and mark
 as readable

On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 03:27:01PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> > That seems excessive and it probably ought to go in as a bug fix
> > afterwards.  Given that it's just an addition of data to the table I'd
> > expect we could cope, we've routinely done that with similar updates in
> > the past without incident.

> Ah, is the depends patch in Mainline already? I assumed it was due to
> go in during the v3.14 merge window? If it's already in Mainline, then
> sure I don't mind if it goes in -fixes via ASoC, no problem.

No, it's for v3.14 - it just seemed like for the size/impact of the
change we should be able to handle the situation more smoothly.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)