[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52963223.9080701@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 09:55:47 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] use -fstack-protector-strong
On 11/27/2013 09:54 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> Looks to be 2% for defconfig. That's way better. Shall I send a v3?
>
> Well, it's better than 9%, but still almost an order of magnitude
> higher than the cost is today, and a lot of distros have
> CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR=y.
>
> So it would be nice to measure how much the instruction count goes up
> in some realistic system-bound test. How much does something like
> kernel/built-in.o increase, as per 'size' output?
>
Do we need CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_STRONG?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists