[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131128091255.GD2761@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 10:12:55 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable@...nel.org,
azurit@...ox.sk, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [merged]
mm-memcg-handle-non-error-oom-situations-more-gracefully.patch removed from
-mm tree
On Wed 27-11-13 18:33:53, Johannes Weiner wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 13b9d0f..5f9e467 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2675,7 +2675,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_try_charge(struct mm_struct *mm,
> goto bypass;
>
> if (unlikely(task_in_memcg_oom(current)))
> - goto bypass;
> + goto nomem;
>
> /*
> * We always charge the cgroup the mm_struct belongs to.
Yes, I think we really want this. Plan to send a patch? The first charge
failure due to OOM shouldn't be papered over by a later attempt if we
didn't get through mem_cgroup_oom_synchronize yet.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists