[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52971C5F.7040307@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:35:11 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parport@...ts.infradead.org,
Maximilian Attems <maks@...o.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport: parport_pc: remove double PCI ID for NetMos
On 11/27/2013 10:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> While here I also drop the entry for titan_1284p2 which is the same as
>> netmos_9815.
>
> Does this change have any runtime-visible effects?
Titan p2 used to specify class + subclass which is now replaced with
PCI_ID_ANY, I doubt this makes any difference at all.
The only runtime visible change I notice is with KERN_DEBUG being
visible. The card details are the same, it always prints
|parport1: PC-style at 0xc120 (0xc128), irq 11, using FIFO
[PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP]
However the ID that was used to detect the card is different:
| PCI parallel port detected: 1415:c118, I/O at 0xc120(0xc128), IRQ 11
vs
| PCI parallel port detected: 9710:9805, I/O at 0xc120(0xc128), IRQ 11
The wrong id print is printed for all devices which come after
PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_PCIe840_G in the id table because the code that
prints the ID table assumes one id per entry.
So we could
- drop printk
- use id->vendor + id->device instead
- do the last item + remove parport_pc_pci_cards and pass the data
struct as data.
- nothing
any preferences?
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists