linux-kernel - Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52971E66.9080006@hitachi.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Nov 2013 19:43:50 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	systemtap@...rceware.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v3 00/23] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()
 and general cleaning of kprobe blacklist

(2013/11/27 22:30), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> 
>> (2013/11/22 11:35), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> (2013/11/21 16:29), Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>
>>>> * Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> (2013/11/21 2:36), Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [ ... ]
>>>>>> one needs to resort to something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # cat /proc/kallsyms | grep ' [tT] ' | while read addr type symbol; do
>>>>>>    perf probe $symbol
>>>>>> done
>>>>>>
>>>>>> then wait for a few hours for that to finish. Then, or while the loop
>>>>>> is still running, run
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # perf record -e 'probe:*' -aR sleep 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> to take a kernel down.
>>>>>
>>>>> Um, indeed, current blacklist is not perfect. [...]
>>>>
>>>> Then it needs to be fixed ASAP!
>>>
>>> OK, I see. At least the two patches included this series
>>> should be fixed. :)
>>>
>>> And more, I need to test all symbols and drills down.
>>
>> OK, what I've found was;
>>  - The functions which can be ftraced look good.
>>    (see tracing/available_filter_functions)
>>  - following functions should not be able to be probed.
>>    - memcpy, memset
>>    - native_load_sp0 and some other native functions (need to be clear)
>>    - restore
>>    - trace_graph_return
>>    - trace_hardirqs_off_thunk, trace_hardirqs_on_thunk
>>    - This list still be not perfect. I just enabled/disabled kprobes
>>      one by one. There might be combined bugs (combination of several
>>      kprobes).
>>  - Some of them are hard to specify by NOKPROBE_SYMBOL because they are
>>    defined in assembly file.
>>
>> Anyway, to fix all of them, I think we need file-based blacklist
>> especially for assembler symbols.
> 
> assembler symbols shouldn't be particular hard either, just put them 
> into the noprobes section.

Would you mean .kprobes.text? Hmm, I hope not to use it anymore,
but yeah, bugfix is more important. Agreed.

>> For example, we can get all text symbols by below command;
>>  nm some-file.o | grep -i " t " | cut -f3 -d" "
>> so that we can make a blacklisted-symbol list for the file.
>> I need to look the Kbuild for how I can do that in Makefile.
> 
> I think it's generally better to add explicit annotations to the code.

OK, thus I'll add annotations first.

Thank you!

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/