[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52972F3A.9090103@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:55:38 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] clocksource/cadence_ttc: Use enable/disable_irq
On 11/27/2013 02:04 AM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> To ensure that the timer interrupt is properly enabled/disabled across
> the whole CPU cluster use enable/disable_irq() instead of
> local_irq_disable().
>
> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c
> index a92350b55d32..246d018d1e63 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/cadence_ttc_timer.c
> @@ -322,18 +322,16 @@ static int ttc_rate_change_clockevent_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
> switch (event) {
> case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
> {
> - unsigned long flags;
> -
> /*
> * clockevents_update_freq should be called with IRQ disabled on
> * the CPU the timer provides events for. The timer we use is
> * common to both CPUs, not sure if we need to run on both
> * cores.
> */
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> + disable_irq(ttcce->ce.irq);
> clockevents_update_freq(&ttcce->ce,
> ndata->new_rate / PRESCALE);
> - local_irq_restore(flags);
> + enable_irq(ttcce->ce.irq);
>
> /* update cached frequency */
> ttc->freq = ndata->new_rate;
>
I am worried about the 'disable_irq' function calling 'synchronize_irq'.
Isn't possible to deadlock with the ondemand cpufreq governor ? I added
Viresh in Cc, he knows better than me the code path.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists