[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131128125619.GA12292@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 09:56:19 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 34/34] perf tools unwinding: Use the per-feature check
flags
Em Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:43:23PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:16:34PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > LINK perf
> > /bin/ld: cannot find -lunwind
> > /bin/ld: cannot find -lunwind-x86_64
> > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[1]: *** [perf] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > I haven't checked this one.. will do tomorrow
> we need to plug libunwind flags/libs only if
> the $(feature-libunwind) is enabled..
> NO_LIBUNWIND - user's decision not to link with libunwind or
> architecture that does not support it
> $(feature-libunwind) - if it's actually installed
> attached change fixies that for me, feel free to use/merge it
Argh, I used tests/make on one machine where those two patches by Jean
were not applied, then rebased on another, the one I use to submit,
those got included but not tests/make tested, which probably explains
why this got thru :-\
Jean, can you please check that this works for you on ARM too?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists