[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131128145948.GZ10022@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 15:59:48 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, zhang.yi20@....com.cn,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into
userspace child
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 09:57:23AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 03:55:05PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Because that is exactly what some users desire? Some RT and HPC people
> > want all those crypt jobs to run on a few designated cpus and not wreck
> > their compute jobs.
>
> And you can't do that reliably from userland. Those things are
> created dynamically. workqueue provides per-workqueue attributes to
> enable those use cases. It doesn't have system-wide default
> attributes right now but adding that shouldn't be too difficult.
Like a parent process, right? So people can use the existing task
interfaces.
Or are we going to tell people; here, there's cgroups for managing your
tasks. Oh and here is this crippled interface X for if you want to
manage these few tasks, and interface Y for managing these other few
tasks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists