linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131128154719.GA14011@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:47:19 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, zhang.yi20@....com.cn,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: exec: avoid propagating PF_NO_SETAFFINITY into
	userspace child

On 11/28, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> So there's three useful parts to having a single parent task:
>
>  - its a task so you can change the entire task attribute set; current
>    and future.

You can't change, say, its fs->root.

OK, OK, this is almost off-topic, I am just trying to say that
(perhaps) in the longer term we might want even more than just
a dedicated kernel thread.

>  - new children will automatically get the desired attributes.

yes,

>  - all children are easily identified by virtual of being children of
>    said parent process.

Well, UMH_WAIT_PROC won't work in this case, or it will be "single-threaded"
too. OK, this is probably solvable, but nontrivial. In this case "khelper"
should act as a /sbin/init for user-mode helpers.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/