[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131128031610.GL3556@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 22:16:10 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs
access to memory reserves
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 06:52:10PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013, Johannes Weiner wrote:
>
> > The long-standing, user-visible definition of the current line agrees
> > with me. You can't just redefine this, period.
> >
> > I tried to explain to you how insane the motivation for this patch is,
> > but it does not look like you are reading what I write. But you don't
> > get to change user-visible behavior just like that anyway, much less
> > so without a sane reason, so this was a complete waste of time :-(
> >
>
> If you would like to leave this to Andrew's decision, that's fine.
> Michal has already agreed with my patch and has acked it in -mm.
>
> If userspace is going to handle oom conditions, which is possible today
> and will be extended in the future, then it should only wakeup as a last
> resort when there is no possibility of future memory freeing.
I'll ack a patch that accomplishes that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists