[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1591147.c0NqbMglPZ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 21:31:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@...il.com>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Carlos Hernandez <ceh@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: Make sure CPU is running on a freq from freq-table
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 07:44:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 28 November 2013 19:42, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 28, 2013 07:11:17 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> Okay.. So wouldn't it be better that we add this special flag only when we
> >> face a real problem? Otherwise this flag might stay unused for long time
> >> and then we might end up removing it..
>
> What about this one?
Well, so are you saying that the problem is only theoretical now?
> > SKIP_INITIAL_FREQUENCY_CHECK ?
>
> Looks fine.. In case this is required, you want this to be set initially for any
> driver?
That depends on what is less work and code churn. How many platforms/drivers
have this problem today? Which ones are they?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists