[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385672502.5352.38.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 13:01:42 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc: jongman.heo@...sung.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inet: further fixes of possible seqlock deadlocks
On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 20:22 +0100, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> This fixes more incorrect uses of *_STATS_BH in process context.
>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> net/ipv4/udp.c | 8 ++++----
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 8 ++++----
> net/ipv6/ping.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 44e3884..f5cc018 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -1160,10 +1160,10 @@ static unsigned int first_packet_length(struct sock *sk)
> spin_lock_bh(&rcvq->lock);
Here we block BH, because of spin_lock_bh()
> while ((skb = skb_peek(rcvq)) != NULL &&
> udp_lib_checksum_complete(skb)) {
> - UDP_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS,
> - IS_UDPLITE(sk));
> - UDP_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS,
> - IS_UDPLITE(sk));
So this is the right thing, this change is not needed.
> + UDP_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_CSUMERRORS,
> + IS_UDPLITE(sk));
> + UDP_INC_STATS_USER(sock_net(sk), UDP_MIB_INERRORS,
> + IS_UDPLITE(sk));
> atomic_inc(&sk->sk_drops);
> __skb_unlink(skb, rcvq);
> __skb_queue_tail(&list_kill, skb);
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> index 59df872..e05cf0a 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
> +++ b/j
> @@ -116,8 +116,8 @@ static int ip6_finish_output2(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> rcu_read_unlock_bh();
>
> - IP6_INC_STATS_BH(dev_net(dst->dev),
> - ip6_dst_idev(dst), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
> + IP6_INC_STATS(dev_net(dst->dev),
> + ip6_dst_idev(dst), IPSTATS_MIB_OUTNOROUTES);
This is ipv6, not inet changes ;)
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -1524,8 +1524,8 @@ int ip6_push_pending_frames(struct sock *sk)
> if (proto == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) {
> struct inet6_dev *idev = ip6_dst_idev(skb_dst(skb));
>
> - ICMP6MSGOUT_INC_STATS_BH(net, idev, icmp6_hdr(skb)->icmp6_type);
> - ICMP6_INC_STATS_BH(net, idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTMSGS);
> + ICMP6MSGOUT_INC_STATS(net, idev, icmp6_hdr(skb)->icmp6_type);
> + ICMP6_INC_STATS(net, idev, ICMP6_MIB_OUTMSGS);
I am not sure we use a seqlock for ICMP stats.
seqlocks were used for 64bit IP stats
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists