[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <006001ceebfa$c85a1020$590e3060$%han@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:29:17 +0900
From: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
To: 'Joe Perches' <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Andy Whitcroft' <apw@...onical.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
'Greg Kroah-Hartman' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] serial: 8250_pci: use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE macro
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 1:08 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:55:35AM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > This macro is used to create a struct pci_device_id array.
>
> Yeah, and it's a horrid macro that deserves to be removed, please don't
> use it in more places.
>
> Actually, if you could just remove it, that would be best, sorry, I'm
> not going to take these patches.
(+cc Joe Perches, Andrew Morton, Andy Whitcroft)
Hi Joe Perches,
Would you fix checkpatch.pl about DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE?
Currently, checkpatch.pl guides to use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE
as below.
WARNING: Use DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE for struct pci_device_id
#331: FILE: drivers/usb/host/ehci-pci.c:331:
+static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids [] = { {
However, Greg Kroah-Hartman mentioned that DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE
shouldn't be used anymore.
So, would you change checkpatch.pl in order to guide to use
struct pci_device_id instead of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE?
For example,
WARNING: Use struct pci_device_id instead of DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists