linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] gpio: davinci: add OF support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52984BAF.4060306@ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:39:19 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] gpio: davinci: add OF support

On Friday 29 November 2013 01:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 06:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> 
>>> Actually, the same was proposed by Linus, but we've tried avoid such huge rework -
>>> by switching to one irq_domain per all banks for example.
>>
>> I didn't really read that proposal from Linus so if two people
>> independently suggested the same thing, there must be something worth
>> considering there :)
> 
> From a GPIO POV it's not such a big deal really, this approach is fine
> and the important thing is that we progress toward a more standard
> driver... it's more a question for the DT people IMO. I really like the
> current patch set.

Rob has acked v5 of this patch. So no objection from DT people too. My
concern was a bit futuristic. Since everyone is happy I think we can go
with the current patch itself.

Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/