[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZBobnSZMLcW6YWc08ew1sb+UY3np+iS4=nqx5wpSNixw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 11:05:20 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@...il.com>,
ext Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"santosh.shilimkar@...com" <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] gpio: omap: refresh patch "be more aggressive with
pm_runtime" against v3.12-rc5
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
>
> try to keep gpio block suspended as much as possible.
>
> Tested with pandaboard and a sysfs exported gpio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>
> [caesarxuchao@...il.com : Refreshed against v3.12-rc5, and added revision check to enable aggressive pm_runtime on OMAP4-only. Because am33xx_gpio_sysc.idlemodes seems to be wrongly marked as SIDLE_SMART_WKUP, which might cause missed interrupts with this patch. Tested on Pandaboard rev A2.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@...il.com>
I'd like Tony and/or Kevin to have a look at this from a PM point
of view so I get some confirmation from the core maintainers
that this is the way forward.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists