linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: tegra: add gpiod

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:03:40 +0100
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Rhyland Klein <rklein@...dia.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM: tegra: add gpiod_lookup table for paz00

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Marc Dietrich wrote:
[...]
> Yes, rfkill is just an interface for userspace to able to control the gpio. 
> E.g. backlight of medcom-wide seems to be related to the pwm controller, but 
> is not a subnode of it. Instead it is a device of its own without parent. 
> Hence, we may include rfkill in a similar, "free-standing" node. But this 
> approch was rejected in the past. Maybe this changed now.

Indeed. I think we really do need ways to represent this kind of device.
If we can't then how are we supposed to get rid of board files?

> Thinking a bit more about it, rfkill is neither a hw block nor a function of 
> the wifi driver, so I guess it cannot be added to the usb controller (or a usb 
> device).

I guess it depends a bit. Some rfkill-type devices may control more than
just WiFi (bluetooth, NFC, ...). If it really only controls WiFi, I
think it would still be reasonable to represent it as a child of the
WiFi device. It is, after all, a mechanism to control the WiFi hardware.

Alternatively I suppose we wouldn't really need to have an explicit
node. The WiFi driver could simply instantiate an rfkill device based on
its own properties.

Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped