| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131129.134625.431945240074254704.hdoyu@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:46:25 +0100
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
To: "swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"thierry.reding@...il.com" <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"robherring2@...il.com" <robherring2@...il.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
"will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCHv6+++ 01/13] of: introduce
of_property_for_earch_phandle_with_args()
Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com> wrote @ Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:58:18 +0200 (EET):
....
> > In other words, an implementation more along the lines of
> > include/linux/of.h's:
> >
> > #define of_property_for_each_u32(np, propname, prop, p, u) \
> > for (prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL), \
> > p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, NULL, &u); \
> > p; \
> > p = of_prop_next_u32(prop, p, &u))
> >
> > ... so you'd need functions like of_prop_first_specifier() and
> > of_prop_next_specifier(), and perhaps some associated set of state
> > variables, perhaps with all the state wrapped into a single struct for
> > simplicity.
>
> Although I couldn't invent any struct to hold params and state here,
> I'd like you to review the following interface is ok or not.
Tried again to introduce a new struct to keep track of iteration state
as below:
----8<---------8<---------8<---------8<---------8<---------8<--
From: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
Iterating over a property containing a list of phandles with arguments
is a common operation for device drivers. This patch adds a new
of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args() macro to make the iteration
simpler.
Introduced a new struct "of_phandle_iter" to keep the state when
iterating over the list.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
---
v6+++:
Introduced a new struct "of_phandle_iter" to keep the state when
iterating over the list.
v6++:
Optimized to avoid O(n^2), suggested by Stephen Warren.
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/iommu/2013-November/007066.html
I didn't introduce any struct to hold params and state here.
v6+:
Use the description, which Grant Likely proposed, to be full enough
that a future reader can figure out why a patch was written.
v5:
New patch for v5.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu <hdoyu@...dia.com>
---
drivers/of/base.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/of.h | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 116 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index f807d0e..16fb2d9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1201,6 +1201,77 @@ void of_print_phandle_args(const char *msg, const struct of_phandle_args *args)
printk("\n");
}
+void of_phandle_iter_next(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+{
+ phandle phandle;
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ int i, count = iter->cell_count;
+
+ iter->err = -EINVAL;
+ if (!iter->cells_name && !iter->cell_count)
+ return;
+
+ phandle = be32_to_cpup(iter->cur++);
+ if (!phandle)
+ return;
+
+ dn = of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle);
+ if (!dn)
+ return;
+
+ if (iter->cells_name)
+ if (of_property_read_u32(dn, iter->cells_name, &count))
+ return;
+
+ out_args->np = dn;
+ out_args->args_count = count;
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
+ out_args->args[i] = be32_to_cpup(iter->cur++);
+
+ iter->err = 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_phandle_iter_next);
+
+static void __of_phandle_iter_set(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *list_name)
+{
+ size_t bytes;
+ const __be32 *prop;
+
+ prop = of_get_property(np, list_name, &bytes);
+ if (!prop) {
+ iter->err = -EINVAL;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ iter->cur = prop;
+ iter->end = prop + bytes / sizeof(*prop);
+ iter->err = 0;
+}
+
+void of_phandle_iter_start(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *list_name,
+ const char *cells_name,
+ int cell_count,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+{
+ iter->err = -EINVAL;
+ if (!cells_name && !cell_count)
+ return;
+
+ iter->cells_name = cells_name;
+ iter->cell_count = cell_count;
+ __of_phandle_iter_set(iter, np, list_name);
+ if (iter->err)
+ return;
+
+ of_phandle_iter_next(iter, out_args);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_phandle_iter_start);
+
static int __of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
const char *list_name,
const char *cells_name,
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 276c546..1132b49 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -74,6 +74,18 @@ struct of_phandle_args {
uint32_t args[MAX_PHANDLE_ARGS];
};
+/*
+ * keep the state at iterating a list of phandles with variable number
+ * of args
+ */
+struct of_phandle_iter {
+ int err;
+ const __be32 *cur; /* current phandle */
+ const __be32 *end; /* end of the last phandle */
+ const char *cells_name;
+ int cell_count;
+};
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC
extern struct device_node *of_node_get(struct device_node *node);
extern void of_node_put(struct device_node *node);
@@ -303,6 +315,16 @@ extern int of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(const struct device_node *np,
extern int of_count_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
const char *list_name, const char *cells_name);
+extern void of_phandle_iter_start(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *list_name,
+ const char *cells_name,
+ int cell_count,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args);
+
+extern void of_phandle_iter_next(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args);
+
extern void of_alias_scan(void * (*dt_alloc)(u64 size, u64 align));
extern int of_alias_get_id(struct device_node *np, const char *stem);
@@ -527,6 +549,22 @@ static inline int of_count_phandle_with_args(struct device_node *np,
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline void of_phandle_iter_start(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *list_name,
+ const char *cells_name,
+ const int cell_count,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+{
+ iter->err = -ENOSYS;
+}
+
+static inline void of_phandle_iter_next(struct of_phandle_iter *iter,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+{
+ iter->err = -ENOSYS;
+}
+
static inline int of_alias_get_id(struct device_node *np, const char *stem)
{
return -ENOSYS;
@@ -613,6 +651,13 @@ static inline int of_property_read_u32(const struct device_node *np,
s; \
s = of_prop_next_string(prop, s))
+#define of_property_for_each_phandle_with_args(iter, node, list_name, \
+ cells_name, cell_count, out_args) \
+ for (of_phandle_iter_start(&iter, node, list_name, \
+ cells_name, cell_count, &out_args); \
+ !iter.err && iter.end - iter.cur >= 0 ; \
+ of_phandle_iter_next(&iter, &out_args))
+
#if defined(CONFIG_PROC_FS) && defined(CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE)
extern void proc_device_tree_add_node(struct device_node *, struct proc_dir_entry *);
extern void proc_device_tree_add_prop(struct proc_dir_entry *pde, struct property *prop);
--
1.8.1.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists